Join the Health Care Basics Webinar on January 28

There is still time to signup for Schottenstein Zox & Dunn's Online Seminar "Health Care Basics - How to Respond to a Government Audit or Investigation" being held Wednesday, January 28, 2009 from Noon to 1:00 p.m. (Eastern Time).

The U.S. government continues to aggressively prosecute health care fraud and abuse. According to its most recent Semiannual Report to Congress, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) recovered $3.68 billion in audit and investigative receivables for the second half of fiscal year 2008. The OIG also excluded 3,129 individuals and organizations from participation in federal health care programs and reported 775 criminal actions and 342 civil actions against individuals or organizations for health care offenses and misconduct. Most civil or criminal enforcement actions begin with a government-directed audit or investigation. Understanding the basic steps to employ when you become involved in an audit or investigation is the first step towards a successful resolution.

Join Kris Dawley and Robert Cochran of Schottenstein Zox & Dunn for an online discussion of how to respond to an audit or investigation and the steps health care providers can take to minimize potential harm to their organization.

There is no fee to attend. However, reservations are necessary.

New Government Contractor Disclosure Requirements

Effective December 12, 2008, entities that provide products or services under contracts subject to Federal Acquisition Regulations ("FAR") must make mandatory disclosure of certain overpayments or legal violations.  The new disclosure requirement is the product of recent amendments to FAR to mandate that government contractors make timely disclosure to the government when they have "credible evidence" that a violation of certain federal criminal laws or the civil False Claims Act (FCA) has occurred in connection with a federal contract. 

The new rule has four primary elements:

  • First, it requires all contractors (including commercial items contractors and small businesses) to establish and promote awareness of a Code of Conduct.
  • Second, it requires all contractors to disclose to the Government any “credible evidence” of (i) certain crimes, (ii) a violation of the civil False Claims Act (FCA), or (iii) a significant overpayment by the Government.
  • Third, it provides for suspension or debarment for a contractor’s failure to “timely disclose” those same events if there is "credible evidence" to support a violation – even where the event occurred prior to the effective date of the new rule.
  • Fourth, it mandates that large companies with non-commercial items contracts implement a comprehensive “internal control system.”

The new rule is a major change from the previous policy of voluntary disclosure.  Most health care products and services are provided to beneficiaries under arrangements that are not subject to FAR.  However, entities that have contracts with federal agencies should check to determine whether the new disclosure requirements apply to their business. 

Physician supervision of therapeutic hospital outpatient services--CMS policy change or mere clarification?

Discussion in the preamble to 2009 Outpatient Prospective Payment System Final Rule (the "2008 Final Rule") calls into question whether the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") is changing its policy regarding direct physician supervision required for the provision of therapeutic services in a hospital on-campus outpatient department or is it merely clarifying its existing policy.

Pursuant to Section 42 C.F.R. Section 410.27 (the "Outpatient Therapeutic Services Regulation"), therapeutic services which hospitals provide on an outpatient basis are those services and supplies (including the use of hospital facilities) which are incident to the services of physicians in the treatment of outpatients. This regulation requires that services furnished at a department of a hospital, that has Medicare provider-based status, must be under the direct supervision of a physician. "Direct supervision" means the physician must be present and on the premises of the location and immediately available to furnish assistance and direction throughout the performance of the procedure. It does not mean that the physician must be present in the room when the procedure is performed.

CMS stated its position regarding the applicability of the direct physician supervision requirement to outpatient services incident to a physician's services in the April 7, 2000 OPPS Final Rule (the "2000 Final Rule"):

We emphasize that our proposed amendment of [the Outpatient Therapeutic Services Regulation] to require direct supervision of hospital services furnished incident to a physician service to outpatients applies to services furnished at an entity that is located off the campus of a hospital that we designate as having provider-based status as a department of a hospital in accordance with [the provider-based status rules]. Our proposed amendment of [the Outpatient Therapeutic Services Regulation] to require direct supervision of hospital services furnished incident to a physician service to outpatients does not apply to services furnished in a department of a hospital that is located on the campus of that hospital. For hospital services furnished incident to a physician service to outpatients in a department of a hospital that is located on the campus of the hospital, we assume the direct supervision requirement to be met. We assume the physician supervision requirement is met on hospital premises because staff physicians would always be nearby within the hospital. (emphasis added).

The foregoing preamble commentary was interpreted by many to mean that when therapeutic services are provided to a hospital outpatient in a department of the hospital that is located on the hospital's campus (but not necessarily within the walls of the hospital), appropriate physician supervision of such services is presumed and the "direct supervision" requirement specified in the Outpatient Therapeutic Services Regulation does not apply. That is to say, due to the close proximity of the department to the hospital's main buildings, many understood CMS' position to be that it presumes that a physician will always be present and on the premises of the location at which the "incident to" services are provided and be immediately available to furnish assistance and direction throughout the performance of the services. As a result, some hospitals adopted a policy that it is not necessary to impose a specific direct supervision requirement with respect to such services.

In the 2008 Final Rule, CMS provided a "restatement and clarification" of the requirements for physician supervision of therapeutic services provided in a hospital setting. Specifically, CMS expressed its concern that the use of the term "assume" in the 2000 Final Rule may have been misunderstood. According to CMS:

As we explained in the CY 2009 OPPS/ASC proposed rule (73 FR 41519), we restated the existing policy because we were concerned that some stakeholders may have misunderstood our use of the term "assume" in the April 7, 2000 OPPS final rule with comment period, believing that our statement meant that we do not require any supervision in the hospital or in an on-campus provider-based department for therapeutic OPPS services, or that we only require general supervision for those services. This is not the case. It has been our expectation that hospital outpatient therapeutic services are provided under the direct supervision of physicians in the hospital and in all provider-based departments of the hospital, specifically both on-campus and off-campus departments of the hospital. The expectation that a physician would always be nearby predates the OPPS and is related to the statutory authority for payment of hospital outpatient services--that Medicare makes payment for hospital outpatient services 'incident to' the services of physicians in the treatment of patients as described in Section 1861(s)(2)(B) of the Act.

Some in the legal community question whether CMS is, in fact, simply clarifying its policy or rather whether it is changing its policy regarding physician supervision requirements for hospital provider-based on-campus facilities. Regardless of how CMS' discussion in the 2008 Final Rule is best characterized, hospital providers are now taking steps to ensure that their provider-based outpatient locations—both on-campus and off-campus—provide therapeutic services under direct physician supervision.

The 2008 Final Rule was published on November 18, 2008 on CMS' website. The relevant discussion is set forth at 73 FR 68702-68704.
 

Can Healthcare Thrive in 2009 Despite the Economy?

'Tis the season for new year predictions.  Desperate to report some good news, business writers appear to like the prospects for some health care stocks and for new jobs created in the health care sector of the economy.  But can H Street really overcome what's happening on Wall Street and Main Street?

Price Waterhouse Coopers in its advertising supplement to Modern Healthcare entitled "Top Nine Health Industry Issues in 2009: Outside Forces Will Disrupt the Industry" presents a somewhat guarded outlook.  The conclusion reached by PWC: "During 2009, the health industry may prove to be a source of profitable growth during an economic malaise.  As new players continue to enter the healthcare market and new technologies develop, the next frontier in healthcare could be hidden from view.  In addition, heightened focus by regulators will need to be monitored carefully as reducing healthcare costs are viewed as a way to stimulate the economy."   As PWC points out, three of the Top 100 Most Powerful People in Healthcare (AOL founder Steve Case, Google's Eric Schmidt, and Microsoft founder Bill Gates) have not traditionally been seen as captains of the healthcare industry.

Perhaps Americans should hope for some creative disruption by outsiders.  It is not as though healthcare insiders have proven particularly successful in prior reform efforts.  Next on the reading list, former Senator and HHS Secretary nominee Tom Daschle's book Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.   SZD Health Law Scan will report on that soon.